---
name: attorneys-fees-motion
title: Motion for Attorneys' Fees
description: Drafts post-judgment motions for attorneys' fees using the lodestar method. Covers prevailing party analysis, rate justification, hours documentation, billing judgment, lodestar enhancements, and supporting declarations. Trigger when user needs a fee motion, fee petition, lodestar calculation, or post-trial fee application.
author: CaseMark
author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/attorneys-fees-motion
license: Apache-2.0
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: us
practice: litigation
language: en
tags: [drafting, motion]
---

# Motion for Attorneys' Fees

Draft a post-judgment fee motion establishing prevailing party status, applying the lodestar method, and presenting a documented fee petition.

## Prerequisites

- Final judgment or order establishing prevailing party status
- Fee-shifting authority — statute (e.g., 42 U.S.C. § 1988), contract, or common law basis
- Contemporaneous time records for all timekeepers
- Timekeeper qualifications (CVs, specializations, recognitions)
- Rate evidence — recent fee awards, bar surveys, market data
- Case docket and procedural history
- Local rules on formatting, page limits, and filing deadlines

## Quick Start

1. Confirm fee-shifting basis and prevailing party status from judgment
2. Collect time records, rate evidence, and timekeeper credentials
3. Calculate lodestar: reasonable hours × reasonable rate
4. Document billing judgment (excluded time) to build credibility
5. Draft motion following the section structure below
6. Prepare supporting declaration and exhibit index

## Motion Structure

### I. Caption & Compliance

- Full court name, division, case number, party designations
- Title: "Motion for Award of Attorneys' Fees [and Costs]"
- TOC/TOA if required; verify local formatting rules

### II. Introduction

| Element | Content |
|---------|---------|
| Moving party | Name + prevailing party identification |
| Fee authority | Statutory citation or contract clause (verbatim) |
| Judgment reference | Date, holdings, relief granted |
| Total fees sought | Dollar amount with breakdown |
| Roadmap | Authority → rates → hours → results |

### III. Litigation Narrative

Chronological narrative emphasizing fee-reasonableness factors:

- Nature of dispute — claims, defenses, stakes
- Procedural milestones with dates — motions (with outcomes), discovery, depositions, trial
- Complexity indicators — novel issues, document volume, expert witnesses, party count
- Opposing conduct increasing work — cite specific orders/correspondence
- Quality of representation — favorable outcomes, results achieved

### IV. Legal Standard

Present in this order:

1. **Fee-shifting authority** — quote statutory/contractual language verbatim
2. **Prevailing party test** — jurisdiction-specific; address *Buckhannon* for settlement-based recovery
3. **Lodestar method** — *Hensley v. Eckerhart*, 461 U.S. 424 (1983)
4. **Johnson factors** — if adopted; *Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express*, 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974) [VERIFY]
5. **Lodestar enhancements** — *Perdue v. Kenny A.*, 559 U.S. 542 (2010)
6. **Fee allocation** — *Hensley* common-core-of-facts doctrine for partial success
7. **Fees-on-fees** — authority for time spent on the fee motion itself

### V. Prevailing Party Analysis

- Quote judgment establishing favorable outcome
- Apply jurisdiction's test to specific findings
- Address degree of success relative to fees sought
- If settlement: address catalyst theory / consent decree applicability
- Preempt limited-success arguments

### VI. Lodestar Calculation

**A. Rate Justification** — for each timekeeper:

| Timekeeper | Role | Years | Rate | Market Evidence |
|------------|------|-------|------|-----------------|
| [Name] | Partner | [X] | $[X]/hr | [Awards, surveys] |
| [Name] | Associate | [X] | $[X]/hr | [Awards, surveys] |
| [Name] | Paralegal | [X] | $[X]/hr | [Awards, surveys] |

Support with: comparable fee awards, bar survey data, attorney qualifications.

**B. Hours by Phase**

| Phase | Hours | Justification |
|-------|-------|---------------|
| Case assessment & pleadings | | Complexity, investigation scope |
| Written discovery | | Volume, disputes |
| Document review | | Document count, privilege review |
| Depositions | | Witness count, preparation |
| Motion practice | | Per-motion breakdown with outcomes |
| Expert work | | Retention, reports |
| Settlement/mediation | | Sessions, preparation |
| Trial preparation | | Witnesses, exhibits |
| Trial/hearing | | Days in court |
| Post-judgment | | Fee motion, enforcement |
| **Total** | | |

**C. Billing Judgment** — document excluded time:
- Clerical tasks at professional rates
- Duplicative research or learning curve
- Error correction
- Quantify hours excluded per category

**D. Staffing Appropriateness** — routine tasks to associates/paralegals; justify senior time on routine work.

**E. Enhancement** (if sought) — multiplier, basis (exceptional results, contingent risk, complexity), jurisdiction-specific authority, inadequacy of base lodestar.

### VII. Supporting Declaration

Numbered-paragraph declaration under penalty of perjury:

- ¶¶ 1–3: Declarant qualifications, role, personal knowledge
- ¶¶ 4–6: Time record authentication — contemporaneous, accurate
- ¶¶ 7–9: Billing judgment — categories excluded, amounts
- ¶¶ 10–12: Rate reasonableness — customary rates, market consistency
- ¶¶ 13–15: Hours reasonableness — necessity, complexity, staffing
- ¶¶ 16+: Additional timekeepers (qualifications, rates)
- Execution block: venue, date, signature, notarization if required

Consider supplemental declarations: peer rate affidavits, client value declaration.

### VIII. Exhibits

| Exhibit | Contents |
|---------|----------|
| A | Detailed time records (date, timekeeper, hours, description) |
| B | Judgment/order establishing prevailing party status |
| C | Fee-shifting statute or contract provision |
| D | Timekeeper resumes/CVs |
| E | Market rate evidence (fee awards, surveys) |
| F | Comparable fee award orders |
| G | Key orders showing complexity/opposing conduct |

Redact work product from time entries; explain redactions in declaration.

### IX. Prayer for Relief

- Attorneys' fees: $[amount] (lodestar) [+ enhancement = $[total]]
- Taxable costs per statute/rule
- Expert witness fees (if recoverable)
- Pre/post-judgment interest (specify rate and calculation date)
- Fees-on-fees (supplemental application reserved)
- Such other relief as the court deems just

## Pitfalls & Checks

- **Cite precisely** — Bluebook format; verify citations are current and not overruled
- **Quote the record** — every factual assertion must cite a specific document or order
- **No inflation** — time entries must be truthful; never exaggerate hours
- **Candor to tribunal** — disclose adverse authority; represent holdings accurately
- **Protect privilege** — redact work product; generalize strategy-revealing descriptions
- **Anticipate opposition** — preempt rate, hours, staffing, block-billing, and limited-success objections
- **Deadline compliance** — commonly 14 days from judgment under FRCP 54(d)(2); check local rules
- **Jurisdiction-specific** — verify catalyst theory recognition; check state lodestar variations
- **Mark uncertain citations** with [VERIFY]
