---
name: trial-brief
title: Trial Brief
description: Drafts persuasive trial briefs for commercial litigation. Triggers when the user needs a pre-trial brief to frame the case theory, secure favorable rulings, or establish evidentiary groundwork. Use during the pre-trial phase after dispositive motions are resolved.
author: CaseMark
author_url: https://github.com/CaseMark/skills/tree/main/skills/legal/trial-brief
license: Apache-2.0
version: 0.1.0
execution_mode: open
jurisdiction: us
practice: litigation
language: en
tags: [brief, drafting]
---

# Trial Brief

Produces the pre-trial brief — often the judge's first substantive engagement with the case and the primary vehicle for presenting a cohesive narrative before trial.

## Quick Start

Gather before drafting:

1. **Pleadings** — complaint, answer, counterclaims, amendments
2. **Discovery record** — deposition transcripts, interrogatories, document productions, expert reports
3. **Prior rulings** — summary judgment orders, evidentiary rulings, case management orders
4. **Key exhibits** — documents, communications, photographs supporting the theory
5. **Local rules** — formatting, length limits, citation style, deadlines, judge preferences
6. **Remaining issues** — what survived dispositive motions and is left for trial

## Document Structure

### 1. Caption and Preliminaries

- Full caption matching court records (division, case number, judge)
- Table of Contents with argumentative headings (advocacy tool, not neutral labels)
- Table of Authorities (constitutional provisions → statutes → regulations → cases)
- Procedural history from filing to current posture

### 2. Introduction and Theme

Open with:
- What this case is fundamentally about — not just legal labels
- Party relationship, what went wrong, the harm or defense
- **Central theme** as narrative framework:
  - Good: "Defendant's calculated abandonment of obligations after securing the bargain's benefits"
  - Bad: "Breach of contract"
- Roadmap of brief organization

### 3. Statement of Facts

- Chronological, thematic, or hybrid narrative
- Every assertion cited to record (deposition page:line, exhibit number, Bates stamp)
- Quote favorable testimony and contemporaneous documents
- **Address unfavorable facts directly** — frame in context, never hide
- Use subheadings for digestibility

### 4. Issues Presented

- Frame as precise questions suggesting favorable answers:
  - Good: "Whether defendant's failure to deliver conforming goods within the contractual timeframe, despite repeated demands and cure opportunities, constitutes material breach"
  - Bad: "Whether defendant is liable for breach of contract"
- Sequence: threshold issues → merits issues
- Each issue maps to an Argument heading

### 5. Legal Argument

Per issue, use headings stating conclusions:

1. **Governing standard** — controlling authority with citation
2. **Elements/factors** — parentheticals showing relevance
3. **Application** — connect evidence to legal requirements with record cites
4. **Analogical reasoning** — compare to favorable precedent
5. **Distinguish adverse authority** — address unfavorable cases directly
6. **Preemptive rebuttal** — "Opposing counsel may argue… However…"
7. **Policy** — only where it supplements doctrinal analysis

Authority priority: binding jurisdiction → same court/district → persuasive.

### 6. Evidentiary Issues / Motions in Limine

**To admit:**
- Authentication foundation
- Hearsay exception identification
- Expert admissibility (Daubert/Frye, qualifications, methodology, relevance)

**To exclude:**
- Relevance deficiency (FRE 401/402)
- Hearsay without exception
- Prejudice outweighing probative value (FRE 403)
- Character evidence limits (FRE 404)
- Expert methodology challenges
- Privilege assertions

### 7. Relief Requested

- Specific relief (judgment, damages amount, injunctive terms)
- Pre-trial rulings requested (motions in limine, scope limitations)
- Attorney's fees/costs with statutory or contractual basis
- Every item linked to arguments in the brief

### 8. Signature and Certificates

- Attorney signature with bar number
- Word count certification if required
- Certificate of service

## Pitfalls and Checks

- **Tone**: Write for the judge — firm and professional, not rhetorical or arrogant
- **Consistency**: Facts, issues, and arguments must align throughout
- **Citations**: Verify every citation for accuracy and current validity
- **Local compliance**: Margins, font, spacing, page/word limits per local rules
- **IRAC**: Use for complex multi-step analyses
- **Theme coherence**: The central narrative must thread through every section
